From the Desk of Donna Roth May 25/26
From the Desk of Donna Roth May 3/26 www.donnaroth.com
Contact Donna Roth for consultations; kdroth@shaw.ca
Transforming the Health of Nations
A healthy body is warm, full of vigor, beauty, radiant energy, magnetism
and power!
Monday, Teleconference Call with Donna Roth
At 5:45 pm PST
Dial 604 227 1018
Agenda:
Registrations are now happening for Team 83 to start in September.
From TAFYH team 82
Risks of Measles Vax
Detection is Not Prevention
Mammograms Used For Overdiagnosis
Breast Cancer Story from Bee
Words of Interest from Donna Roth
Words of Interest from Carol
For TAFYH information go to www.donnaroth.com.
Click on TAFYH Taking Action for Your Health.
Lesson
on Teeth
This lesson on teeth is very serious.
I have witnessed all kinds of diagnosis directly and unknowingly caused by root canals; RA, panic attacks, brain tumors, cancer, thyroid problems, prostate problems,
Please share this information with your TAG team and family members.
Many dentists will tell you there is nothing wrong with your root canals because their diagnostic tools do not pick up infected teeth.
My clients then insist that their root canals be extracted only to find out they are always full of infections.
Then the question arises; How accurate are those diagnostic tools??
The Story of the Fleas in the Jar and Human Behavior.
Fleas are placed into a jar and the jar is sealed for 3 days. Then after the 3 days the jar lid is removed. The fleas will not jump any higher than the lid of the jar. It has also been found that the offspring of these fleas also do not jump higher than the lid of the jar.
There are huge implications applied to human behavior. Just like the fleas in the jar we have been programmed to live in the jar.
There is slow drip conditioning which makes sure that each man woman and child is taught to think and behave a certain way so they are weak financially, physically, intellectually, morally, ethically, spiritually and emotionally.
We all watch our TV and computer screens, our education comes from government schools, the books we read came from the government library, we read magazines in doctor's waiting rooms and our state of health depended on blood tests, thyroid tests, PSA tests, mammograms, CT scans, MRI’s, cholesterol tests, PCR tests, blood pressure tests, blood sugar tests, yearly checkups, and diagnosis. So this question needs to be addressed. Is it possible that all these factors have lead to a fully controlled population by the exact same group handcrafting the average citizen into that jar of complying goody- two -shoes which of course is a total non-threat to the system responsible for creating that jar.
I love this quote from Jason Christoff who runs a coaching program. “Find mentors, whomever they are. Start reprogramming and reconditioning yourself for life outside the jar, which the system conditions you to accept over your lifetime. At this time, it's not even an option. You either take up this goal of getting out of that glass jar or the system will absolutely flush you down the drain, over the next 5 years.”
From Ted Kuntz
The Measles Vaccine
The measles vaccine is a live-virus vaccine grown in
cultures of chicken embryo cells and aborted fetal tissue. While measles was a
serious illness in the last century, the mortality from measles declined 98.5%
before the vaccine was introduced. Measles is no longer considered a public
health threat due to improvements in sanitation, nutrition, clean drinking
water, and improved living conditions. Measles-associated deaths are rare in
developed countries with good nutrition.
Those advocating for mass measles vaccination claimed that
one shot in 68% of the population would eradicate measles by 1967. That claim
was clearly without merit given measles continues 60 years later in spite of a
high rate of vaccination. While the vaccine has been effective in reducing the
symptoms of measles, there is compelling evidence that measles vaccination is
contributing to the significant increase in chronic health conditions in
children today.
A stand-alone measles vaccine is no longer available.
Measles vaccination is only available in combination with mumps and rubella
(MMR) and chicken pox (MMR-V). These are all live, attenuated viruses.
Consideration for the Vaccine Decision
In considering any medical treatment, both the benefits and
risks ought to be considered.
Risks of Measles Vaccination
· Mothers who have been vaccinated for measles do not
transfer long-lasting maternal antibodies to their infants which protects the
infant in the first few months of life. This puts infants at higher risk of
serious complication. The measles rate in children under 15 months is nearly
triple that of babies born to mothers unvaccinated for measles. [i]
· There is compelling evidence that administering the MMR
vaccine prior to three years of age can cause regressive autism. In 2014, Dr.
William Thompson, a CDC scientist directly involved with vaccine – autism
research, revealed data showing a 3.4X increased risk of autism in African -
American boys given the MMR vaccine before age 3. CDC scientists were
instructed to destroy this evidence. Autism has become epidemic in recent
decades with more than 1 in 31 children diagnosed. California reports an autism
rate of 1 in 12 boys.
· MMR and MMRV are among the most reported vaccines for
seizures and brain inflammation in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System.
· The measles virus can shed for weeks following
vaccination.
· As of April 24, 2026, there have been 119,517 reports of
measles-vaccine reactions, hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths following
measles vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting
System, including 584 related deaths, 9,319 hospitalizations, and 2,276 related
disabilities. Approximately 50 percent of those adverse events occurred in
children under three years old. [ii]
From Sayer Jy
In 2018, Goldman Sachs issued an internal report asking
whether curing patients was a “sustainable business model,” noting that
one-shot cures “quickly exhaust recurrent revenue streams.”[15] The
mammography-to-treatment pipeline illustrates the point precisely: screening
mammograms generate revenue. Abnormal findings generate diagnostic mammograms.
Biopsies generate breast DCIS diagnoses. DCIS diagnoses generate surgeries.
Surgeries generate radiation. Radiation generates follow-up imaging. Hormone
suppression therapy generates five to ten years of pharmaceutical revenue. A
woman who is overdiagnosed with DCIS and overtreated is not a failure of the
system — she is, in a precise financial sense, the system working as
designed.[16]
Detection Is Not Prevention
When the USPSTF gives mammography an “A” or “B” grade, it is
rating a screening test. In simple terms, it is saying how well the test finds
unusual cells in the breast before symptoms appear. What it is not rating is
prevention in the real sense of the word. A screening test does not stop cancer
from starting. This is the big mix-up at the heart of modern cancer policy:
early detection gets treated like prevention, even though they are not the same
thing. They are cousins at best, not twins.
A mammogram cannot lower chronic inflammation. It cannot fix
a “leaky gut.” It cannot calm the immune system or repair the body conditions
that may help cancer grow in the first place. It is a camera, not a cleanup
crew.
It also cannot change the way genes are switched on or off.
It cannot rewrite the cell signals that may quiet cancer pathways or turn them
up. What it can do is find something. And once it finds something, it can kick
off a long chain of tests and treatments. The benefits of that chain, when
studied carefully, look much smaller than the public story often makes them
seem.
In breast cancer screening, overdiagnosis means finding a
real cluster of abnormal cells that would never have caused symptoms, spread,
or shortened a woman’s life. In other words, something is there, but it may
never have become a real-life problem. Her body may have been keeping it under
control the whole time. But once it is found, it gets a label: breast cancer.
And once it gets that label, the usual medical response is big and serious:
biopsy, surgery, radiation, and often years of hormone-blocking drugs. The
alarm bell goes off, and nobody wants to be the person who says, “Maybe this
bell is a little dramatic.”
Estimates for how often overdiagnosis happens vary a lot,
from about 11% to more than 50% of breast cancers found by screening. A 2012
study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that after mammography
became widely used, early-stage breast cancer diagnoses doubled, but late-stage
cancer went down only a little. That suggests many of the extra cases were not
dangerous cancers caught just in time. They were cancers that may never have
caused harm at all.
The biggest driver of overdiagnosis in mammograms is
something called ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS. Before widespread
screening, it was rarely talked about. Now it makes up about 20% of all breast
cancer diagnoses in women in the United States. DCIS means abnormal cells are
growing inside the milk ducts. It is not the same thing as invasive cancer. It
is a finding, not automatically a future disaster.
Even so, DCIS has often been treated very aggressively:
lumpectomy or mastectomy, then radiation, and often years of tamoxifen. Some
women have lost a breast over DCIS. And more evidence now suggests that many
low- and medium-grade DCIS cases never turn into invasive cancer. In many
cases, the body may have been handling the situation on its own. Sometimes the
body deserves more credit than it gets.
Why overdiagnosis keeps going even though the evidence is
out there
The research on overdiagnosis is not hidden in some dusty
basement. It has appeared in major medical journals, and the Cochrane
Collaboration has said that for every woman whose breast cancer death may be
prevented through mammography, about ten women are unnecessarily diagnosed and
treated. That has been known for years. And yet the screening system keeps
rolling along like a train that forgot to check the brakes.
Now here is a question that no mammography screening every address
as Sayer Jy asks: What changes in the body make breast tissue more likely to
support cancer growth in the first place? In other words why do women get
breast cancer.
Sayer Jy confirms strongly my thinking.Some researchers
argue that gluten-containing grains can increase intestinal permeability,
letting bacterial toxins move into the bloodstream and keep the immune system
stirred up. Some conventional dairy products may also affect immune signalling
in ways that push the body toward inflammation. In short, food is not just
background scenery in breast cancer risk. It may be one of the main stage
managers.
At the same time, some helpful compounds found in
vegetables, including cruciferous ones like broccoli, may influence cell
behaviour in ways that slow cancer growth. Those kinds of signals are mostly
missing from highly processed food. So the food environment is not a side note
in breast cancer risk. It is a major upstream factor. And yet screening
guidelines and political debates mostly act as if none of this exists, which is
a bit like discussing a house fire while ignoring the person holding the matches.
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as phthalates,
bisphenol A, and synthetic estrogens from plastics and personal care products,
are also linked to changes in breast tissue that may raise cancer risk. They
can affect the way genes are regulated, and some research suggests the effects
may even carry into future generations. This is the kind of biology that
matters for real prevention. And none of it involves standing in front of a
mammography machine wearing a paper gown that somehow fits no human body ever
made.
This is my third time in TAFYH, and it won't be the last.
TAFYH helps me break lifelong conditioning so I can
understand what health is, how to achieve it and how to maintain it.
TAFYH is a process. Patience and persistence are key and
acknowledging that the time required to obtain true and sustainable change is
correlated to how much toxicity has piled on since the time I was born.
It's about removing layers of toxicity that have
accumulated over years, not to become someone new but to reveal who I have
always been. TAFYH has helped me realize that Fear has kept me from my
potential – this reminds me of Michaelangelo who said he did not create the
sculpture of David, he removed pieces of marble to reveal what was already
there.
My curiosity about health started when I was 12 years
old. TAFYH is the final puzzle piece that I didn’t know I was looking for. And
I am now learning just how difficult simple can be.
Cancer Story:
Breast by Sharon
64. True
Account of the Paw Paw Program Resolving a Possible Cancerous Breast Lump
In the early part of 2010 Sharon went through the procedure of a live blood
analysis and this process indicated that there was something suspicious in the
left breast that was somewhat of a concern. The analyst recommended a
Thermography test which Sharon agreed to. This test indicated blocked
lymphatics in the area of the left breast and a possible 80% chance of breast
cancer in the left breast. Sharon immediately made an appointment with her
medical doctor who stated that Sharon must have a mammogram and an ultrasound.
Sharon agreed to the ultrasound, but the mammogram made her very nervous. She
had in the past witnessed a dear friend who had succumbed to the mammogram procedure
where the tumour in the breast was crushed and spread throughout her body. Her
friend died. “I was scared” states Sharon. This doctor, however, was not
cooperative and Sharon simply sought the advice of another doctor who willingly
requisitioned her request.
In Feb. 2010
Sharon underwent a medical ultrasound which reported “ There is a 4x 3x 3 mm
hypoechoic nodule along the 130 vector. This is situated deep within the left
breast.” A mammogram was again recommended and Sharon’s refusal was not kindly
received and threat of Sharon’s having to pay for the ultrasound were strongly
suggested.
August 6, 2010 Sharon meets Fran at the health food store who introduces Sharon
to the Paw Paw program and the book , Practical Solution to the Cancer Injury
by Donna Roth. “ I immediately bought the book and immersed myself into its
treasures of information. Fran very generously organized the program for me but
when I saw the list of the products I stepped back. I was just not mentally
ready .”
“On reading all
about the program I was sold. I knew this was going to be intense, but I was
excited. There was something that I could reach for where I could actually help
myself. I felt empowered! I knew I had to focus on this and nothing else. I
knew this would work just by reading all about the incredible testimonials in
the book. I knew the medical establishment did not have the answers and it did
not make any sense for me to do radiation or chemotherapy. I knew a lot of
people who had been diagnosed with cancer and they all depended on the medical
system alone and they ended up dying. I couldn’t put my trust there. I was
comfortable in using the medical system only for the purpose of diagnosis. “
Sharon spent the next few months getting her finances in order and mentally
preparing herself for the big change that she would impose on her life, a
change for the good. In the meantime, the medical people continued with their
persistence for Sharon to have a mammogram. “They called me relentlessly to
book a mammogram. I was made to feel that they should totally control me. It
was not easy. They made me feel that it was mandatory to do a mammogram, that I
had no choice. They made me feel that I would fall through the cracks if I did
not submit to their protocol. They told me that I could not solely put my trust
just in the ultrasound and they continued to aggressively push the mammogram on
me. They made me feel totally guilty and powerless. I found out a lot about the
medical system. And the more they pushed the more certain I became about doing
the Paw Paw program.”
“On January 26, 2011 I called Donna Roth. I was impressed that she freely
offered her phone number in her book. We scheduled an appointment and I was
able to meet her face to face. I had read her book thoroughly and I was
mentally ready to take this on. I knew I was dealing with something big. I was
emotionally ready. The Paw Paw program was laid out before me.
Avoid all sugars, grains, starches, legumes, dairy,
Eat meats, fish, eggs, vegetables, nuts, seeds, berries.
Make a she twice a day with:
Chinese Mineral Chi Tonic
Flax Hull Lignans
Nature’s Gold
Collatrim Plus
Aloe Vera Juice
Berries
Solstic
Water
Drink only water and Chlorophyll.
Drink only Green tea or E-tea if a cup of tea is desired.
Start Paw Paw slowly and keep increasing day by day until 10 Paw Paw a day .
Take Protease Plus on an empty stomach.
“The information I received from Donna was very precise and every supplement
and why I needed it was well explained. Donna was strongly confident with this
program and her knowledge indicated her expertise and experience. I went home
and followed this program to a T!”
Sharon followed this program for 4 months and then went to see her doctor for a
follow-up ultrasound. The ultrasound showed absolutely no lump in the left
breast. A further examination by the doctor indicated that solid mass that was
there earlier had all gone. Sharon was ecstatic and told the doctor that she
was doing the Paw Paw program. Her doctor simply would not acknowledge her joy
and was left in disbelief of the unethical approach that Sharon had taken to
look after her own breast health.
Now it is Dec. 2016, 5 years later and Sharon is breast cancer free. She remains empowered and excited about her
new discoveries. Recently she completed her requirements for TAFYH. She has
since shared her experience and her success with a friend who was diagnosed
with bladder cancer. Now she is the witness of yet another cancer success story
using the Paw Paw program for bladder cancer simply because she shared her
story with John. Sharon has decided to join Donna, Fran and the team of people
out there who are actively helping others overcome cancer. She is actively
promoting the book Practical Solution to the Cancer Injury by Donna Roth; she
is telling everyone to join the Monday evening calls with Donna Roth and she is
teaching others how to do the Paw Paw program. “It is plain to see that all
diseased conditions have a common thread and that our bodies are created to
heal.”
